How Shall We Then Live? - Lesson Outline
Day 1 - Preamble
Review philosophy terms and our goals in anticipation to reading our first page.
-
Begin by listing to our first sound byte from Dr. Ravi Zacharias.
-
Reviewing expectations
-
Glossary
and some concepts so when the material does come up, they will be vaguely familiar with them already.
Off Site Glossary
-
Some sort of visual time line of dichotomies to add as we move forward
- Visual Time line of dichotomies
Period of Naturalism : 550 BC
Ionians : 624 - 524 BC
Interested in the problem of the origin and nature of the universe.
The Eleatic School : 550 BC
The oneness and immutability of reality and the distrust of sense-knowledge which appears to testify to the existence of multiplicity and change.
The Pluralist : 500 - 428
No becoming; Infinite divisibility; Universal mixture; Predominance; Homoiomereity (all like parts)
The Atomists : 460 - 370 BC
Materialistic Naturalism asserts that matter is the only reality, and that all the laws of the universe are reducible to mechanical laws.
The Metaphysical Period
The Sophists : 400 BC
No objective standard of the true and false, that that is true which seems to be true, and that that is false which seems to be false.
Socrates : 470 - 399 BC
Determine the conditions of universally valid moral principles a science of human conduct. Self-knowledge is the starting point,
The only true knowledge is a knowledge by means of concepts. The concept, he said, represents all the reality of a thing.
Plato : 428 - 347 BC
The problem of change.
The objectively real Ideas are the foundation and justification of scientific knowledge.
Left side of the Water Shed Principle
Metaphysical Idealism: The doctrine that nothing exists except ideas or minds; material reality is an illusion. The mind is the sole existing thing.
Aristotle : 384 - 322 BC
The problem of change.
Universal (ideas) in particular things
Right side of the Water Shed Principle
Metaphysical Materialism: The doctrine that nothing exists except matter in motion (material reality). The mind is just a material entity.
The Ethical Period
Stoicism : 336 - 264 BC
Conceived the world as an intelligent teleological system and subordinated man to the universal will.
Epicureanism : 342 - 270 BC
Viewed the world as a machine.
Skepticism : 365 - 275 BC
Turned its attention to what seemed good in all systems, pieced them together, and presented a world view from the materials at hand.
Eclecticism : 350 BC
Turned its attention to what seemed good in all systems, pieced them together, and presented a world view from the materials at hand.
Greek Science : 300 - 200 BC
Scientific world, from medicine to astronomy.
The Religious Period
Attempt to resolve the problem of human life by recourse to religion.
The Judaic Alexandrian School : 30 BC - 50 AD
An attempt to coordinate Oriental religion with Greek speculation.
Reconcile the truths revealed in the Bible with all that had been said by the Greek philosophers.
The Neo-Pythagorean School : 50 BC
The attempt to construct a world religion upon Pythagorean doctrines.
The Neo-Platonic School : 176 - 242 AD
The attempt to make a religious philosophy of Plato's teaching.
St. Augustine : 354 - 430 AD
World was created by God from nothing, through a free act of His will. Time is a being of reason ("rens rationis") with a foundation in things which through becoming offer to the mind the concept of time as past, present, and future.
The Period of Scholastic Philosophy (Middle Ages)
The Dialecticians : 1033 - 1182
Intellect as unable to reason without being enlightened by God
Beginning of Modern Humanism
Renaissance
Rejection of scholastic authority, renewed interest in classical antiquity, and excitement about the prospect of achieving scientific knowledge
Reformation
Modern and Contemporary Philosophy
Empiricism : 1561 ...
Reliance on experience as the source of ideas and knowledge. More specifically, empiricism is the epistemological theory that genuine information about the world must be acquired by a posteriori means, so that nothing can be thought without first being sensed.
Francis Bacon : (1561-1626)
John Locke : (1632-1704)
Isaac Newton : (1642-1727)
David Hume : (1711-1776)
Rationalism : 1538 ...
Rene Descartes : 1596 - 1650
Blaise Pascal : 1623 - 1662
Enlightenment : 1689 ...
Placed great emphasis on the use of reason in the development of philosophical, social, political, and scientific knowledge.
Voltaire : 1694 - 1778
Kantian Criticism : 1724 - 1804 (Immanuel Kant)
... "not a matter of WHETHER we posses such knowledge but HOW"
Impossible to gain knowledge of the world by either reason or sense experience alone
Idealism : 1762 ...
Only mental entities are real, so that physical things exist only in the sense that they are perceived.
Idealism is the philosophical view that the mind or spirit constitutes the fundamental reality
Objective idealism accepts common sense realism (the view that material objects exist) but rejects naturalism (according to which the mind and spiritual values have emerged from material things)
Subjective idealism denies that material objects exist independently of human perception and thus stands opposed to both realism and naturalism
Positivism : 1798 ...
Natural science, based on observation, comprises the whole of human knowledge.
Karl Marx : 1818 - 1883
Utilitarianism : 1748 ...
The doctrine that human individuals live only for the benefit of the state or society, from which all rights are derived.
Jeremy Bentham : 1748 - 1832
James Mill : 1773 - 1836
John Stuart Mill : 1806 - 1873
Friedrich Nietsche : 1844 - 1900
Complete rejection of the existence of human knowledge and values or denial of the possibility of making any useful distinctions among things.
Critical Idealism : 1848 ...
Kant stated that it is not perception that forms reason, but reason that forms perception: knowledge is not gained by perceiving nature immediately, but through the mediation of the consciousness. Therefore human beings are not machines and their personality is not static but dynamic and progressive.
German Psychologism : 1832 ...
Laboratory in the world dedicated to experimental psychology
Wilhelm Wundt : 1832 - 1920
"Father of Experimental Psychology" and the "Founder of Modern Psychology"
American Idealism : 1855 ...
American
Insights into the interplay between fate and freedom in human history.
The New Idealism : 1836 ...
French Revolution era
Lays great stress upon dynamism, voluntarism or action.
Evolutionism : 1809 ...
Charles Darwin : 1809 - 1882
Pragmaticism : 1839 ...
Disagreed with Pragmatism's defiinition of truth and their methods.
Pragmatism : 1842 ...
A doctrine that is a form of naturalism which denies the legitimacy of philosophical problems and methods and claims that science is the only knowledge which is exact and ultimate.
Psychoanalysis : 1856 ...
A method of psychotherapy developed by Sigmund Freud. By the methods of free association and dream analysis, the origins of neurotic (cf) disturbances may be elucidated and brought into consciousness.
Sigmund Freud : 1856 - 1939
Neo Positivism : 1882 ...
(logical empiricism, logical neopositivism, logical positivism)
Logical analysis of scientific knowledge.
Existentialism : 1813 ...
Emphasizes the primacy of individual existence over any presumed natural essence for human beings.
Soren Kierkegaard : 1813 - 1855
Analysis of despair and freedom
Intuitionism : 1859 ...
Reliance on unmediated awareness as a criterion of truth. In logic and mathematics, intuitionism denies the independent reality of mathematical objects and the principle of excluded middle. In moral philosophy, intuitionism is the metaethical theory that moral judgments are made by reference to a direct, non-inferential awareness of moral value.
Phenomenology : 1908 ...
Philosophical method restricted to careful analysis of the intellectual processes of which we are introspectively aware, without making any assumptions about their supposed causal connections to existent external objects.
Philosophical Hermeneutics : 1900 ....
How one interprets the actual intended meaning of something.
Neo-Realism : 1838 ...
False -> Principle which states that consciousness constitutes reality.
False -> The statement of Pragmatism which makes man the measure of things.
The Frankfurt School : 1898 ...
Developed the methodology of critical theory.
They tried to exhibit dialectically the contradictions imposed upon modern human beings by varieties of social organization that abuse formal rationality in order to deny power to classes of citizens.
Critical Rationalism : 1902 ...
Firstly, "How do we know what we know, and how can we tell whether it is true or not?".
Secondly, "What is the best way to solve problems".
Objectivism : 1905 ...
Metaphysics: Objective Reality (Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed.)
Epistemology: Reason (You can’t eat your cake and have it, too.)
Ethics: Self-interest (Man is an end in himself.)
Politics: Capitalism (Give me liberty or give me death.)
Cultural Theory : 1885 ...
Concerned with subjectivity and power--how human subjects are formed and experience their lives in cultural and social space.
Structuralism : 1885 ...
Method of interpreting social phenomena in the context of a system of signs whose significance lies solely in the interrelationships among them.
PostModernism : 1885 ...
Abandonment of Enlightenment confidence in the achievement objective human knowledge through reliance upon reason in pursuit of foundationalism, essentialism, and realism. In philosophy, postmodernists typically express grave doubt about the possibility of universal objective truth, reject artificially sharp dichotomies, and delight in the inherent irony and particularity of language and life.
Deconstructionism : 1885 ...
Interpretive method that denies the priority or privilege of any single reading of a text (even if guided by the intentions of its author) and tries to show that the text is incoherent because its own key terms can be understood only in relation to their suppressed opposites.
Scientism :
The doctrine that nothing exists except that which can be measured by the instruments of science. Reality = the material universe.
Politicism :
The dogma that all human problems are political in nature and the solution must be a political one. Public polls determine truth and morality.
The Revival of Classical Realism : 1882 ...

Chapter 1 - Ancient Rome
Page 24
Why Christians were killed ?
-
Not because they worshiped Jesus (there were other religions untouched)
-
They worshipped an infinite - personal God ONLY, not Caesar
-
Christians held to a higher power which was a standard to judge the state.
-
Value system with true / False, and Absolutes.
-
Assume author is factual?
-
Is this fact or is this inference ?
-
What are the facts?
-
Why are Christians persecuted today ?
-
Why are Christians not persecuted today ?
Chapter 2 - The Middle Ages
Page 32
Christian struggle with Jesus prayer
"... be in the world and not of it."
-
Example of Commander Maurice - martyr
-
How do we handle our material possessions?
-
What sort of life study ?
-
Can we have something if someone else does not ?
-
Open handed generosity a Christian Characteristic ?
-
Is there value to "corporate" charity ?
-
How does this compare with "personal" charity ?
-
How does delegated charity ?
-
What happens on a personal level with corporate vs personal charity ?
-
What happens on recipient level with corporate vs personal charity ?
Chapter 2 - The Middle Ages
Page 35
Church saw problems with Roman / Pagan music and so it disappeared
-
Is there an issue with what music we listen to?
-
Is there a difference on distinction with different types of music ?
-
Does all music have to edify ?
-
Teacher's Note: Whatever you resolved - hold that idea (until later when we see more about how the arts and music can shape philosophy).
Chapter 2 - The Middle Ages
Page 35
Monasteries created because the groups were to have no money, having given their all to the poor
-
What is a fair life style for a family to have ?
-
If you can define "fair" then
-
What do we do about sub fair?
-
What do we do about better than ?
Chapter 2 - The Middle Ages
Page 48
Renaissance begins and Middle Ages end 1300 - 1550 roughly
-
Called Dark Ages because Humanistic thought is born. Pre-Humanist must be Dark and Hopeless.
-
My view - Dark Ages BEGINS with Birth of Humanism.
-
Study of Humanism
-
Man is the center of all things
-
Thomas Aquinas - 1225 - 1274
-
Everything is a particular
Chapter 2 - The Middle Ages
Page 55
Grace vs Nature Views
-
Grace, the Higher; God the Creator; heaven and heavenly things; the unseen and its influence on the earth; Unity, or universals or absolutes which give existence and moral meanings.
-
Nature the lower; the created; earth and earthly things, the visible and what normally is the cause - and - effect universe, what man as man does is the earth; diversity, or individual thinks, the particulars, or the individual acts of man.
-
Grace view -> Nature has no importance, or is only important if "Grace" gives it such.
-
Nature view -> no universals or absolutes. No meaning or importance to particulars except what we ourselves give it.
-
Is that possible?
-
Can we set an absolute value on any particular?
Chapter 3 - The Renaissance
Page 57
Thomas Aquinas introduced the seeds of Humanism into the Church.
-
Secularism in the Church caused 2 reactions
-
Reformation - page 79
-
Renaissance - page 57
-
Both are reactions to the deal of secularism
-
1st, What is Secularism?
-
Secularism refers to the system of separation between politics and religion, restricting religion only to private acts
-
Secularism is the principle that there exist no gods or purely spiritual entities.
-
Taking god out of religion.
-
ie.
-
A church meets to pursue some political or social function with nary a mention of god.
-
Bingo night ?
-
A church which is strongly supportive of a political party rather than issue related derived from much prayer and looking for God's guidance.
-
How does secularism differ from Humanism?
-
Secularism is the process which removes god from religion and ends up with Humanism.
-
My opinion is strongly that Humanism IS a religion in its own right.
Chapter 3 - The Renaissance
Page 60
Renaissance moved toward modern Humanism.
-
Value System says man is his own measure.
-
Man is autonomous, totally independent
Chapter 3 - The Renaissance
Page 71
With the movement is the loss of anything with meaning.
-
Humanist says - Starting with myself, I can cure any problem given enough time.
-
What does this result in?
-
Negativism, since time passed and there were no answers forthcoming
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Page 79
Reformation
-
John Wycliffe (1320 - 1384)
-
Bible Supreme Authority
-
The Bible and Bible ONLY - not Church "practice"
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Page 80
Martin Luther (1483 - 1546)
-
Nailed 95 Thesis to the Church door in Wittenborg on October 31, 1517
- Discuss this quote from Martin Luther.
-
"I am much afraid that schools will prove to be the great gates of hell unless they diligently labor in explaining the Holy Scriptures, engraving them in the hearts of the youth. I advise no one to place his child where the Scriptures do not reign paramount. Every institution in which men are not increasingly occupied with the Word of God must become corrupt."
-
(Leonardo Da Vinci 1452 - 1519)
-
(John Calvin 1509 - 1564)
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Page 81
Thomas Aquinas - 1st paragraph.
-
Reformation took a critical attitude towards Christianity, traditions, and Church
-
Reformation rejected the autonomy of human reason, which says thought ( the mind ) is infinite, with all knowledge within its realm.
-
He was forced to hide in Wartburg Castle for 8 months. He used the time well, translating the entire New Testament into German
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Page 82
How secularism got into Christianity.
1. The Church is an equal to the Bible
2. Human works were required for salvation
-
What are they?
-
Examples
-
Going to Church
-
Fasting
-
Avoiding certain sins, lifestyle
-
Doing certain things
3. After Thomas Aquinas - Pagan thought and content added to Christianity.
-
Example.
-
Michelangelo's painting in Sistine Chapel gave equal prominence and billing to the Prophet Jeremiah (Bible) and Prophetess Delphi (pagan).
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Page 86
We have truths about God, ultimate Universe
-
Meanings
-
Values
-
Absolute
-
Truths about men and nature
-
not all truths, but Truths
-
Gives meanings to all particulars
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Page 86
Does man have dignity?
(bottom)
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Page 89
Reformers destroyed art which had become spiritual images.
-
Sometimes even the donor destroyed their own donated art because it was misused.
-
Worship was to be God only
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Pages 94 - 96
Letters to Durer
-
Top of page 95 - Papacy ... heavy burdens of human laws.
-
What does this sound like?
-
How does this happen?
-
Does it happen often?
-
How long does it take?
-
Who originates these "Burdens"?
-
Is there malicious or benign intent?
Chapter 4 - The Reformation
Page 100
Freedom in both North and South
-
South - Renaissance,
-
Freedom was license to do anything
-
Shedding of morality
-
Shedding of inhibitions
-
North - Reformation
-
Freedom, but with moral compass
-
Absolute Values
-
Question:
-
Are more laws needed to combat the crime and moral decay seen in this country?
-
Do we first have to determine what role laws play in society?
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 105
A statement of the effect of the "Gospel" on society.
-
A generalized assertion to begin with.
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 106
The Bible is the Basis of Law
-
God's Laws -> Man's Laws
-
Legal Base
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
The Constitution of the United States
-
"inherent unalienable rights"
-
Where do those "inherent unalienable rights" come from?
-
What makes them unalienable?
-
What can that possibly mean?
-
[In a free government, the security for civil rights must be the same as that for religious rights. It consists in the one case in the multiplicity of interests, and in the other, in the multiplicity of sects. The degree of security in both cases will depend on the number of interests and sects; and this may be presumed to depend on the extent of country and number of people comprehended under the same government.
by Martin E. Marty]
-
So does religion get equal treatment in the United States?
-
Article 1
-
Section 2
-
The number of Representatives shall not exceed 1 for every thirty thousand.
-
Section 3
-
The Vice President of the United States shall be the President of the Senate......
-
Section 4
-
The times, places, and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators.
-
The Congress shall assemble at least once every year....
-
Section 6
-
... They (Senators and Representatives) shall in all cases, except treason, felony, and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place.
-
Section 7
-
.... (Sundays excepted)...
-
[Why not weekends or Saturdays or Holidays?]
-
Section 8
-
... but all duties, imposts, and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.
-
To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court.
-
To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or office thereof.
-
Article II
-
Section 1
-
Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress......
-
The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for two persons, of who one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves. And they shall make a list of all the persons voted fro, and of the number of votes for each; which list they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the Senates and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such majority, and have an equal number of votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately choose by ballot one of them for President; and if no person have a majority, then from the fine highest on the list the said House shall in like manner choose the president. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by States, the representation from each state having one vote;A
quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or member from two thirds of the states , and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. In every case, after the choice of the President, the person having the greatest number of votes of the electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal votes, the Senate shall choose from them by ballot the Vice President.
-
[This is revisited by Amendment XX. Basic change is the elector shall vote for a President and, separately, vote for the Vice President. In the above scenario, G.W. Bush could have been President and Al Gore the Vice President. I believe this would have made for a very unhappy White House. Maybe?]
-
Article IV
-
Section 4
-
The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government....
-
Article VI
-
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several states legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both for the Untied States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution, but no religious test shall be ever required as a qualification to any office of public trust under the United States.
-
Bill of Rights
-
Amendment I
-
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speed , or for the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
Amendment II
-
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
-
Amendment VIII
-
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
-
Amendment IX
-
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
-
Amendment X
-
The powers not delegated to the Untied States by the Constitution , nor prohibited by it in the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
-
-
Additional Amendments
-
Amendment XIV
-
Section 2
-
[This effectively cut the representation in the House of Representatives down considerably for a while.]
-
Section 3
-
[This effectively kept most Southerners from holding public office after the Civil War which opened the door for "Carpet Baggers".]
-
Amendment XVII
-
[Formerly, the Senators could be elected by the state legislature, if the state legislature chose to do so. Now all US Senators were to be elected by popular state vote.]
-
Amendment XVIII
-
[Allowing alcohol is a cultural value converted into a Constitutional Amendment.]
Comment on Supreme Court Judge Scalia's comments...
Brain Blessed Scalia Nails Judicial Over-Politicization
The Associated Press: - February 14, 2003
"The selection of judges has become over-politicized because too many courts wrongly believe the Constitution should be reinterpreted to fit the times, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said Thursday." This man is brilliant. My friends, if I didn't have the brain I have, it would be Scalia's brain I would want. You can't say anything about the judicial confirmation crisis better than this.
Scalia made his remarks to lawyers and law students at the University of Pennsylvania, and went on to say that too many courts wrongfully believe the Constitution should be "reinterpreted to fit the times." This is the false notion that the Constitution is a bendable, flexible, "living and breathing" thing. That's the same as saying you have no Constitution, if you're going to change its fundamental meanings on passing whims.
Scalia blamed empty seats on the bench on both parties, which have blocked the confirmation of judges they disagree with on politics. "I say a pox on both their houses.'' AP: "A self-described 'originalist' and one of the court's most conservative judges, Scalia said he believes the Constitution means the same thing now as it did when it was first drafted, and that it should be read fairly literally." Yes! That's the beauty and the genius of that document.
"If more judges followed the same theory, he said, politics would enter into judicial decisions less often and politicians would be more likely to leave the courts alone. 'We're not looking for good lawyers anymore. The most important thing we look for are judges who will read into the Constitution the rights that we like, and read out of the Constitution the rights that we don't like.''' He's right on the money. What a huge, learned and wise man - a man truly worthy of the title "justice." ]
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 109
What are inalienable right?
-
Is it possible for a humanistic society to have inalienable right?
-
Inalienable rights are rights which are based upon the Law of God. and Transcend Man's Laws.
-
Identify some inalienable rights
-
Are they really inalienable?
-
Or Mans
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 109
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
-
Grew up with Christian influence but was hostile
-
Stressed inalienable rights
-
government by consent
-
separation of powers
-
right of revolution
-
Rejected ALL but Empirical
-
That is, if you can experience it, then it is real
-
Only the particulars, if you remember that.
-
Inalienable means it is either innate or not based upon experience
-
Certain instincts are innate
-
His reasoning wasn't so good, was it?
-
He came to conclusions based upon evidence he had rejected as admissible.
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 110
John Locke, Thomas Jefferson ( 1743 - 1826 ) were Christians of the second order
1. One who comes to God through Jesus
2. Living within the Christian culture
-
Liberal, MO. near St. Louis, early 1900s experiment.
[The town is Liberal, Missouri. This was a town which a leading atheist, George H. Walser, was able to convince to exclude religion from its midst. No church could exist within the city, and religious people were encouraged not to live in the community. What happened was that crime and immorality became so rampant that the city failed and finally asked churches to come in and establish a religious base for the moral and legal system of the town.]
-
Caveat
-
I have heard of this story years ago and its been repeated a few times. Attempts to find information on has produced only this
-
[A newspaper in Liberal is distributing two books which record the history of this town. They are:
The Strange Town of Liberal Missouri $8.40
The Story of Liberal Missouri by O.E. Harmon $6.40
These prices include shipping/handling charges, and they can be ordered by sending your check to:
The Liberal News, P.O. Box 6, Liberal, Missouri 64762]
-
[George H. Walser and Liberal Missouri by Boyce Houton
This book might be available through:
College Press, P.O. Box 1132, Joplin, MO 64802]
-
I have some concern this could be an urban legend, books not withstanding.
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 112
Renaissance promoted ruthless autocratic rule
-
Niccolo Machiavelli ( 1469 - 1527 )
-
Handbook for Benito Mussolini (1883 - 1945 )
-
Adolf Hitler ( 1889 - 1954 )
-
Embraced economic and political elitist
-
Meaning?
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Chapter
Guilt is a factor? Homewook paper, then discuss.
Discuss Guilt - Each student should have a paper written on this.
-
Students to write down everything they know and think may be true about GUILT.
-
What is it?
-
What does it do?
-
Let's look at the different persectives.
-
Individual
-
Christian Individual
-
Humanistic or Agnostic Individual
-
New Age or Eastern Individual
-
Within Families
-
Within Society
-
Does it create or motivate certain behavior?
-
Does it impede certain behavior?
-
Is Guilt something you can get your hands on?
-
Can anyone use Guilt as a tool?
-
Can any group use Guilt as a tool?
-
What has Guilt to do with Philosophy?
-
How does your idea of guilt lead into your Philosophy?
-
How does your Philosophy help mold your idea of guilt?
-
Does everyone have the same opinion about guilt as you have?
-
If NOT, then
-
What are some of the other views?
-
Why are these other views wrong (and your right)?
-
Do these wrong views on guilt have any consequences?
-
What are those wrong view consequences?
-
If YES, then
-
Answer same questions as if you had answered "NOT", because not everyone agrees with you even if you claim they do.
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 114
Suddenly, we see an urge to confront our sins.
-
An apology.
-
At no other point in history does the author make a case where WE are participants in history's woes.
-
Our personal views and experiences influence our conclusions
-
In rush to apologize we almost overlook that slavery continues today in the 21st century in Moslem countries.
-
Also, the definition of slave comes from Aristotle and not the Bible.
-
Before Christ and for 1,700 years we've had injustice. Now, suddenly, Christianity is responsible for the sin of omission for not having cleaved to God's word forcefully enough to rid the world of Slavery and Economic injustice.
-
PC stuff, the whole lot of it.
-
Notice how the "framers of the debate" set how we are each are going to respond.
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 116
Jeremy Bentham ( 1748 - 1832 ) - Father of Utilitarianism
-
" . . . the greatest happiness for the greatest number."
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 117
Christian aid to end slavery.
-
A little late, but we "apologetically" and with shuffling feet, admit Christianity is not wholly at fault for slavery.
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 118
William Wilberforce ( 1759 - 1833 )
-
Wilberforce the Christian, credited with ending Slavery in England
Chapter 5 - The Reformation -- Continued
Page 119
Reformed Presbyterian Church
-
No slave owner could be member.
Slavery Reparation Issue
Chapter 6 - Enlightenment
Page 120
Enlightenment
-
Which 2 countries are subject of Enlightenment?
-
What huge change hit countries in Enlightenment?
-
What was most notable characteristic of England's Revolution?
-
What was most notable characteristic of French Revolution?
-
Bloody and ended up as authoritarian
-
"Reign of Terror"
-
What was Philosophy base behind Revolution?
-
England
-
France
-
Reason
-
Humanist Base
-
Nature
-
Happiness
-
Progress
-
Liberty
-
When was English Revolution?
-
When was the French Revolution?
-
Why were the results so different?
Chapter 6 - Enlightenment
Page 120
Who is Voltaire ?
Chapter 6 - Enlightenment
Page 126
What are some characteristics of Communism?
-
Expects to move through socialism's on way to Communism on way to Utopian Communism.
-
Dictatorship by small ruling party
-
Repression - sometimes bloody
-
Animal Farm would be good to read about now.
-
Humanist Philosophy.
-
Animal Farm video available, but would prefer we read.
-
Assign 2 weeks to read Animal Farm with 3 pages of typed "book report" with mostly their thoughts and reactions.
-
Intervening week can be optional class day.
-
Those who are bored can skip the "optional" day
-
and the rest can attend and we'll do some catch up and watch the Animal Farm video with popcorn.
Chapter 6 - Enlightenment
Page 127 / 128
Christian vs Humanist philosophy addressing evils of slavery.
-
"... And even if we must say with sorrow that all too often Christians were silent when they should have spoken out, especially in the areas of race and the compassionate use of accumulated wealth, the Christians who were silent were inconsistent with their positions."
-
Now contrast that with the following paragraph.
-
"... humanism has no final way of saying certain things are right and other things are wrong. For a humanist, the final thing which exists -- that is, the impersonal universe -- is neutral and silent about right and wrong, cruelty and non-cruelty. Humanism has no way to provide absolutes. Thus, as a consistent result of humanism's position, humanism in private morals and political life is left with that which is arbitrary."
-
Discuss
-
Ramifications
-
Possible to have no right or wrong?
-
How do the differing philosophies determine what is right vs evil?
-
Christian
-
Humanist
-
Might makes right
-
Present day polls ?
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 130
Rise of Modern Science
-
Came along with Renaissance and Reformation
-
Copernicus ( 1475 - 1543 )
-
Vesalius ( 1514 -1564 )
-
Early science based upon what?
-
What does that mean?
-
Ramifications?
-
Roger Bacon ( 1214 - 1294 )
-
Robert Grossetteste ( 1175 - 1253 )
-
Was there a philosophy behind early science ?
-
Is there a philosophy behind modern science ?
-
Does philosophy influence science ?
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 131
Why did Galileo and Copernicus get into trouble?
-
Their discoveries clashed with Church doctrine
-
Galileo claimed Aristotle was wrong.
-
The Church had adopted Aristotle's positions
-
( He was a Greek Philosopher, pre-Jesus, into their doctrine )
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 132
Author did not want to emphasize Renaissance and Reformation influenced.
-
Do you think they are unrelated?
-
Is it possible we were "led" to this conclusion which makes the disclaimer non genuine and convenient?
-
Can you describe science which acts independent of any philosophy?
-
Can Christianity be the father of Modern Science?
-
Because people believed a reasonable God created the world, they expected to find something true about nature.
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 132
Francis Bacon ( 1561 - 1626 )
-
Lawyer
-
Essayist
-
Lord Chancellor of England
-
Fought battle against scholasticism.
-
Slavish dependence on accepted Authorities
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 134
Epistemology
-
What is it?
-
Theory of knowledge
-
How we know
-
How we know we know
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 134
Proposition
-
Modern Science would not have come about without Christianity!
-
What is the unique thing, brought by Christianity which would bring this about?
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 135
It is said early Modern Scientist tried to discover HOWbut did not try to discover WHY.
-
The author points out Newton did try to discover WHY.
-
Would your philosophy influence your discovery of WHY?
-
If there is only one WHY --> then even if one came from God and another from man and another from Buddha, you would get to the same place?
-
But, are all WHY resolved perfectly?
-
Know accounts of how stuff which later were determined as false?
-
Most WHY, HOW, are results of Theories
-
Most WHY, HOW, begin with a Theory to prove or disprove
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 136
Can this statement be true?
-
" It was believed that the idea of law in the Universe and with the scientific methods of enquiry to discover truths would never lead to any conclusions in consistent with Biblical history and miraculous religion."
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 138 - 139
Werner Heisenberg's (1901 - 1976 ) indeterminacy principle
-
Basically --> he seems to be saying man's tools will never be good enough
-
Can't determine velocity and location at the same time because velocity is moving and location is stationary.
-
Also, with atom, can't know gravity pull on various sides, and how it might be different to both atoms.
-
Can't determine atom's surface at point of contact which would influence angle of recoil.
-
Can't determine elasticity as to make one bounce sooner or faster than the other.
-
Elasticity probably depends on point of contact
-
2 people collide, stomach more elastic than hips.
-
Restated --> There are always assumptions
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 142
Reaction to statement Greek, Moslems, and Chinese eventually lost interest.
-
Not created, leaves us with random happenings
-
No order
-
No rules
-
No rational
-
Only science was intellectual curiosity.
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 142
Did rise of Technology from Science originally come from Christian Base?
Christ Based \ / Practical application Technology
| Science |
World Based / \ Intellectual Curiosity
Chapter 7 - The Rise of Modern Science
Page 143
Cause and Effect
-
Does everything fall under this principle?
-
Are there special situations?
-
Is God outside Cause and Effect?
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 144
Plato is finally mentioned
-
Without an absolute, particulars have no meaning.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 145
Jean - Paul Sartre (1905 - 1980 )
-
To have a value, there must be an absolute value to compare against morals.
-
Sartre was an exponent of atheistic existentialism
-
"Existence is prior to essence. Man is nothing at birth and throughout his life he is no more than the sum of his past commitments. To believe in anything outside his own will is to be guilty of 'Bad Faith'. Existentialist despair and anguish is the acknowledgement that man is condemned to freedom. There is no God, so man must rely upon his own fallible will and moral insight. He cannot escape choosing." (Chambers.)
-
Sartre's Theory of the Universe:
-
"There is no ultimate meaning or purpose inherent in human life; in this sense life is 'absurd'. We are 'forlorn', 'abandoned' in the world to look after ourselves completely. Sartre insists that the only foundation for values is human freedom, and that there can be no external or objective justification for the values anyone chooses to adopt."
-
From Leslie Stevenson's book, Seven Theories of Human Nature (1974) (Oxford University Press, 2nd Ed., 1987); Stevenson was a reader in logic and Metaphysics at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland.
-
Sartre emphatically rejects the idea advanced by Freud that certain mental events have unconscious causes:
-
"The crucial concept in his diagnosis is that of self-deception or 'bad faith' (mauvaise foi). Bad faith is the attempt to escape anguish by pretending to ourselves that we are not free. We try to convince ourselves that our attitudes and actions are determined by our character, our situation, our role in life, or anything other than ourselves.
-
Sartre gives two famous examples of bad faith.
-
He pictures a girl sitting with a man who she knows very well would like to seduce her. But when he takes her hand, she tries to avoid the painful necessity of a decision to accept or reject him, by pretending not to notice, leaving her hand in his as if she were not aware of it. She pretends to herself that she is a passive object, a thing, rather than what she really is, a conscious being who is free.
-
The second illustration of the cafe waiter who is doing his job just a little too keenly; he is obviously 'acting the part'. If there is bad faith here, it is that he is trying to identify himself completely with the role of waiter, to pretend that this particular role determines his every action and attitude. Whereas the truth is that he has chosen to take on the job, and is free to give it up at any time. He is not essentially a waiter, for no man is essentially anything."
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 145 - 146
Non Christian Philosophers ( Greek --> )
-
Man can begin with himself and gather enough particulars to make his own universe
-
Reject knowledge outside of themselves
-
Does this seem reasonable?
-
2) Accepted Validity of reason
-
What are pitfalls of reason ?
-
Assumptions
-
Preconceptions
-
Resistance to some conclusions
-
Supposition on Theory
-
Unknowns
-
Do people always make logical choices?
-
Does it seem possible to work out every experience with perfect logic?
-
Example of Illinois footprints in Coal Bed.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 146
Non Christian Philosophers ( Early - Pre 18th Century)
-
Believed they could come to understand all that there is by reason alone.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 146
What was 1st Shift in Modern Science?
-
From
-
Uniformity of Natural Causes in an Open System
-
God and Man were outside Cause and Effect
-
To
-
Uniformity of Natural Causes in a Closed System
-
First excluded God from the System
-
Later, man is excluded as previously seen, but only as a particular
-
table
-
chair
-
cricket
-
car
-
man
-
Modern Science is "Natural" or "Materialistic Science"
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 147
Ludwig Feuerbach ( 1804 - 1872 )
-
The mind is a particular, thus, we have no free-will
-
Can we determine your reaction to this?
-
All Cause and Effect and particulars?
-
What else goes in a Closed System?
-
Absolutes
-
Morals
-
Emotions
-
Freedom
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 148
Humanism runs its course -- Pessimism
-
High Renaissance humanism grows as man is center of his Universe
-
Ends up as man is nothing in a pointless Universe
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 148
Charles Lyell ( 1797 - 1875 )
-
Principles of Geology
-
No force in the past except those that are active now.
-
Problems with that?
-
What is science?
-
That which can be observed.
-
What can we observe in our past?
-
Effects?
-
Consequences?
-
Are we adequately equipped to know what forces Caused an Effect and their Consequences in the past without observation?
-
None the less, this is important.
-
Restated, we know what has been by what we observe today.
-
At best, it is a theory, not a principle
-
Disprove by Logic
-
Definition (Science is Observed)
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 148
Charles Darwin ( 1809 - 1882 )
-
The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle of Life (1859)
-
What do they mean by an ongoing increased complexity?
-
If we step up on step at a time, RANDOMLY, in a million years, isn't it just as likely in another million years we could take a step DOWN instead of UP?
-
Isn't this going against the odds, to always be going up?
-
What raises questions of How and Why?
-
What is this "... nature's unique experiment to make a rational intelligence prove itself sounder than the reflex." ??
-
Nature is a Scientist outside the Closed System?
-
It seems to me we have seen, repeatedly, how Humanism and the world creep into our Christianity.
-
It is good to me to see Godly influences sneaking into the Humanist explanation.
-
Of course, it is ill-logical because they had to alter a definition to work in their answer.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 150
Social Darwinism
-
Heinrich Himmler ( 1900 - 1945 )
-
Nature takes its course in "Survival of the Fittest"
-
Ethic of strength over weakness
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 150
What about Genetic Engineering?
-
If people kept alive through medical advances produce weaker next generation.
-
How does that strike you?
-
Kept alive suggest after child bearing years, thus, the next generation is already on their way.
-
Only way to be logical is
-
Anyone is weak, then their offspring are tracked down and snuffed out too.
-
Run Statistical predictions on our future health and deny children to those who do not fit the statistical Genetic model.
-
Genetic Engineering propagate the fittest
-
Fittest will be self consumed
-
Humanist
-
Elitist
-
Birth control and abortion
-
They won't get their numbers up.
-
Will shrink as a numeric portion of the greater Society.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 152
The Philosophy Switch
-
What is with all the
?
-
Later - shown in error and produced a New Theory
-
Still Optimistic someone would draw perfect circle - or know all there is.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 152
Modern Man
-
Rene Descartes ( 1596 - 1650 )
-
Is he Father of Modern Philosophy?
-
Humanism ideal failed ( but we still pursue it )
-
Restated, ANY solution which might work as long as GOD is excluded.
-
Optimism that we will eventually know all there is in a Closed System changed to Pessimism
-
4 Transitional Philosophers
-
Jean-Jacques Rousseau ( 1712 - 1778 )
-
Immanuel Kant (
-
George Wilhelm Hegel (
-
Soren Kierkegaard (
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 154
Jean-Jacques Rousseau ( 1712 - 1778 )
-
From High Renaissance
leads us to
1. --> Everything is machine, including people
2. --> Man stands as Good and corrupted by outside influences
-
Freedom from God, authority, culture, restraint, absolute freedom of individual
-
How could we know what this absolute freedom is?
-
"General Will" through Social Contract
-
How could someone or group, having God, culture, and restraints all their lives -- ever express an "absolute"?
-
What profoundly "stupid" thing did Jean say?
-
My question: How could someone or group, NOT having God, culture, and restraints all their lives -- ever express an "absolute"?
-
Sounds like rubbish so far.
-
"In order that the Social compact may not be an empty formula, it tacitly includes the undertaking which alone can give force to the rest, that who ever refuses to obey the general will shall be compelled to do so by the whole body. This means nothing less than that he will be forced to be free."
-
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, you can be sure, was 100% sure society would never disagree with his assessment.
-
Sometimes it seems, ego is a requirement to be a secular Philosopher -- pride in man's, and their own ability to know everything.
-
See, you don't have to be a teenager to be a "know it all"!
-
Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Confessions (1782 )
-
best education is
-
Absence of Education
(no outside influences)
-
I forgot, why are we studying him?
-
Why would not everyone dismiss him out of hand?
-
My opinion?
-
Jean-Jacques Rousseau starts with Pride
-
Kids to an orphanage
-
Pride and selfish
-
Disturbing statement, top of page 156
-
" ... the later education theories of self-expression which are influential in Our Day."
-
Why?
-
Led to Bohemian ideal
-
His thinking was very influential
-
-
and my respect for Modern Philosophy just went down a notch
-
Hippie - Bohemian ideal
-
anti standards
-
anti values
-
anti restraints
-
"Natural" = morally good
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 156
David Hume ( 1711 - 1776 )
-
Doubts reason as a method of knowing true.
-
Believe in what if not reason?
-
Own experience and feelings.
-
Know where this goes back to?
Plato --> mind
Aristotle --> particulars
-
So, what is being said is
Mind --> Plato Rousseau
Matter --> Aristotle Aquinas
-
Questions Cause and Effect
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 158
Who left Enlightenment to follow Rousseau?
-
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe ( 1749 - 1832 )
-
Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller ( 1759 - 1805 )
-
Gotthold Lessing ( 1729 - 1781 )
Reason - Enlightenment
\
\
Emotion
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 159
What is Natural Law School of Jurisprudence?
-
Since they, in their pride, have killed god, they now attempt to create a complete and perfect set of Laws based upon Natural Law and their pride.
-
Thus, they can have absolute morals this way.
-
The author did not say it, but ultimately, they concluded that "Might makes Right".
-
Author's big problem is nature dishes out cruelty and uncruelty equally.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 160
What is the Big Problem?
-
Rationalistic --> man is machine --> no freedom
-
On one hand, how is this a problem?
-
If we have no freedom, then we have no freedom.
-
Is Philosophy the study looking ONLY for answers you WANT to hear?
-
Can a Philosophy be rejected because it resolves to conclusions you don't like?
-
Guess what? I really don't believe Rationalistic theory is entirely valid.
-
Can you know everything if you are a machine?
-
If there is something outside your experience, you may be preprogrammed to have certain blind spots.
-
How can you determine there is nothing outside the box if you had predetermined NOT to know of anything outside the box?
-
All you really know is, you haven't experienced it, but that doesn't mean there isn't something out there watching you.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 160
Immanuel Kant ( 1724 - 1804 )
-
2nd Person to help change direction of Philosophy
-
Attempted to bring these two worlds together.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 162
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel ( 1770 - 1831 )
-
Tried to pull together Reason and Non-Reason
-
What concept did Georg father?
-
{ Complicated model of state and history flow } >>>> Relativity ( called Synthesis )
-
What is gone is relativity reigns ?
-
Truth
-
Especially absolute truth
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 163
Soren Kierkegaard ( 1813 - 1855 )
-
What formula did he come up with ?
-
with a "Leap of Faith" one can find meaning without reason
-
If you are restricted to reason only (Closed System) then you are going to be frustrated.
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 165
What was the beginning of everything?
-
Nothing - no thing (personal)
-
God - everythingism (personal)
-
Pan - everythingism (impersonal)
-
Louis Pasteur ( 1822 - 1895 )
-
Showed living cannot come from non-living
-
But, adding long reaches of time makes this viable? Probable?
-
But, NOT can't be proved wrong!
-
Its one of these "Leaps of Faith" which we aren't suppose to be considering as "scientists".
Chapter 8 - The Breakdown of Philosophy and Science
Page 166
What is intellectual suicide ?
-
Beginning with man alone, we can find value and meaning to life.
-
They defined the closed box a having reason only and then find themselves grabbing for meaning OUTSIDE the Closed Box.
-
The Box cannot be both Closed and there be something outside it at the same time.
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 167
Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
-
Jean-Paul Sartre ( 1905 - 1980 )
-
Which side of the track was he on?
-
Particulars with Aristotle, Aquinas, called Existentialist.
-
How did Sartre destroy his theory?
-
Signed Algerian Manifesto - 1960
-
which declared the Algerian Was was a dirty war
-
Without values, how could he make this value judgement?
-
How could you participate in politics unless it was something you had a personal stake in, like power, money, whatever. But certainly not for a "just cause".
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 168
Karl Jaspers ( 1883 - 1969 )
-
Finally found a way to have "meaning" in life using only Existentialism ?
-
He allowed for an out of the box experience, hence, it wasn't using ONLY Existentialism.
-
A Vision From God!, or something to that effect.
-
Anyone can have "Special Experience"?
-
Well, have you had a "Special Experience"?
-
Called "Final Experience".
-
What if you had more than one "Final Experience"?
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 170
Aldoses Huxley ( 1894 - 1963 )
-
Where did he think "meaning" was at?
-
What concept dies about this time
-
Can anyone do Scientific Experiments to evaluate Truths in People's Minds?
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 171
What else helped people find "meaning" in their heads after drugs?
-
Religious experiences
-
Hinduism
-
Buddhism
-
holding your breath for 4 minutes
-
Then Psychedelic Rock
-
Occult
-
Poetry
-
Art
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 174
What's Existential Methodology?
-
Reason separated completely from Non-Reason
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 174
What's been happening through the ages in regard to the Church and the Secular?
-
Humanism elements continue to come into the Church, even to this day
-
Removal is during Reformation, Fundamentalism, and now constant vigilance
-
In fact, Church shopping is often looking for the Church with just the right combination of Church and Humanism to suit our Secular tastes -----
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 174
What is Theological Existentialism?
-
Takes our relationship with Jesus Christ and interprets it through a particular Philosophic view --
-
Existentialism, or the particulars, or Non-Reason
-
Both Theological Existentialism and Rationalistic Theology begin with a secular world view and philosophy and then strain to interpret god through their model.
-
If their world model is perfect, then what do they need of God?
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 175
What is a Rationalistic Theologicalor Religious Liberalism?
-
Wants historic Jesus without Supernatural
-
Synthesize (merge) Rationalism of Enlightenment period with Christianity.
-
Why be a Theologian if your true god is Rationalism?
-
They would rather destroy their relationship with God in order to keep to a particular Philosophic model they were wed to.
-
Late 18th Century and beginning of 19th Century.
-
This is why the German Christians were ineffective to stop moral decay. They had already decayed from within.
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 176
Karl Barth (1886 - 1968)
-
What Theological dichotomy did he express?
-
Kierkegaardian Theology
-
Existential Theology
-
What is "Higher Critical" view of Bible?
-
Theology was part of Non-Reason
Dichotomy
-
That even with mistakes, the "Word" --> still comes through
-
(Mistaken to believe Bible full of Mistakes unless looking at Catholic Bible)
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 177
Dichotomy Problem for Theology
-
Same as philosopher in search for meaning.
-
As long as they define the world on one side of the dichotomy, anything outside the box is not available.
-
Bible is Non-Reason
-
thus, outside the box
-
Irrelevant
-
Truths Irrelevant
-
Absolutes Irrelevant
-
Of course, we built this box ourselves, but lets pass on that...
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 178
God is dead ?
-
Since any meaning found in the Bible has been placed off limits by our Philosophic model, the "words" are just empty words.
-
Now, see how easy it is to go the next step and assign NEW meaning to these words, in accordance with our
-
politics,
-
vices, and
-
points of persuasion.
Chapter 9 - Modern Philosophy and Modern Theology
Page 178
Friedrich Nietzsche ( 1844 - 1900 )
Tape
-
Big influence on Hitler and Mussolini
-
Hitler basically worked out Nietzsche's philosophy in real life - or non-life for money.
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 182
Chapter 10: Modern Art, Music, Literature, and Films
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 182
What was generation gap?
Adults held values but did not / could not demonstrate why they were values
Youth adopted the God is dead, pessimism, relativism, and so had a large value difference with older folks
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 182
How did we get Monolithic Consensus?
-
Everyone agreeing in the same basic dichotomy or philosophic model.
-
-
>
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 183
Meaning Found in Art
-
Claude Monet ( 1840 - 1926 )
-
Pierre Auguste Pissarro (1830 - 1903)
-
Alfred Sisley (1839 - 1899)
-
Edgar Degas (1837 - 1917)
-
Art expressed world views such as fragmented reality picture
-
Art took on a dreamy look
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 190
Who was the most absurd artist?
-
Marcel Duchamp (1887 - 1969)
-
He realized just about anything could pass for art if it was signed, so he just signed off on stuff and Ta Da!
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 190
Quartets of Beethoven ( 1825, 1826 )
-
Represents a shift in music
-
Gustav Mahler (1860 - 1911)
-
Death of person, tonality, culture, Pessimism
-
Invented 12 tone row
-
Perpetual variation with no resolution
-
Fragmentation in music, but who would listen
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 197
General Culture
-
We get the fragmented, pessimism through
-
poetry,
-
cinema,
-
novels,
-
drama (The Death of a Salesman)
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 198
Auguste Comte ( 1798 - 1851 )
-
We don't "just see", but categorize, evaluate, compartmentalize, and set an opinion on it.
-
Thus, it is not forthright, but subjective
-
Also, separating illusion from reality
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 198
What is Epistemological Base?
-
Because the world was created by God
-
Man can find out about the Universe by Reason
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 198
John Loche ( 1632 - 1704 )
What is Empiricism ?
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 199
Invalid Scientific results
-
If Science is a matter of controlled experiments and observation to disprove or prove a theory
-
How can results and Theories be set aside because the scientist dislikes the results?
Chapter 10 - Modern Arts, Music, Literature, and Films
Page 200
What is Linguistic Analysis?
-
Philosophy --> Analysis of Language
-
Existentialism Analysis
-
Hangs on the particulars
-
Non-Reason
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 206
This Book was written in 1976
-
Is the picture on 207 reflective of Current Society?
-
Are the issues about Education the same as today?
-
Is the same pessimism with regard to Life's meaning the same today?
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 207
Are Universities hot beds of Radical and Destructive Philosophies?
-
What contributes to this?
-
Do these Radical and Destructive Philosophies consider themselves to be Radical and Destructive Philosophies?
-
Difference between a short term, selfish view, and looking at the big picture?
-
Young people open for anything different
-
Professors catering their message to their young audience.
-
Even Professors desire acceptance ??
-
Professors and Tenure - An Issue?
-
What happens to Professors with Epistemological Base Philosophy?
-
Amongst Students
-
Amongst Peers
-
Amongst Superiors
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 212
Should the government defend itself from its citizens at any costs?
-
What is subversives and terrorist have infiltrated?
-
How does Truth and Relativity factor into this?
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 215
What did Marx use to make Communism an idealistic solution?
-
Borrowed the concept of the "dignity of man" from Christianity
-
Empty words
-
No checks and balances
-
What philosophy is Communism based?
-
What kind of government is Communism?
-
Monarchy has a king with counts, dukes, etc to run things
-
Communism has party leader with the rest of the party to run things
-
Republic has President / Congress / Judiciary with Bureaucrats to run things
-
Top Elitist with Elitist party to run things.
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 216
Finally I see the Author pointing out something I've been thinking all along
-
"... a setting of limits as to what one will observe and a refusal to look outside of these boundaries... "
-
I've been saying it in terms of a BOX
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 217
What is Sociological Law?
-
Mostly, our Values codified into Laws
-
What is law based on experience?
-
Al Gore - 2002
-
"The Constitution of the United States is a living document."
-
Why the big problem with appointing judges?
-
Sees Judges should judge Law based upon "Experience".
-
Thus, Judges MUST be Liberal, agreeing with their view, since the Judge will be creating LAW.
-
Sees Judge should judge Law as "King"
-
Why cannot Liberals accept the Conservative Judge?
-
Cannot accept Conservative view of Law is King and cannot accept anyone else could either. Thus, they don't trust any judge to do anything else BUT legislate from the bench. If they are going to legislate, the judge must have their political view.
-
Why cannot Conservatives accept Liberal Judges?
-
Cannot accept Judges who will not uphold the Constitution, irrespective of their political views.
-
Suppose a Liberal Judge was recommended who held that "Law was King". The Liberals could not support this person because of Philosophical differences.
-
Suppose a Conservative Judge was recommended who held that "Law was King". The Liberals could not support this person because their Philosophical views makes it impossible for them to conceive someone might judge on an issue which is 100% AGAINST their convictions and experiences just because it is what the law says.
-
You'll notice a little duplicity in the 2 examples too.
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 217
What do you think about this?
-
"Truth is the majority vote of that nation that could lick all others"
-
What do you think about polls?
-
How should polls be used?
-
Where should polls not be used?
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 217
Is this a True Statement?
-
"The only absolute allowed is the absolute insistence that there is no absolute"
-
Fails logic test
A = A
A != A
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 223
Harvesting the dead
-
What do you think about that?
-
I have seen this in more than one film, read in more than one book.
-
I had thought it was "Just science fiction", but now I must wonder if it wasn't expressing a philosophy
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 223
One man and a Bible can direct society
-
Is that right?
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 225
Do we have an "Elite" in America?
-
Certain Families
-
Kennedy
-
Bush
-
Rockefeller
-
Got there with Old Generations in Politics
-
Those who travel in these circles.
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 227
Personal Peace and Affluence
-
What does the Author believe motivates most people?
-
Personal Peace and Affluence
-
Where do you see it manifested?
Chapter 11 - Our Society
Page 227
Our Society
-
What does this mean to you?
Chapter 12 - Manipulation and the New Elite
Chapter 12 - Manipulation and the New Elite
Page 229
There is that pride again
-
Walden Two (B. F. Skinner 1904-1990)-> everyone is manipulated so everyone behaves exactly as what?
-
As the scientist wants them to.
-
How come the scientist is always "outside the box"?
-
How does Dr. Skinner know he wasn't manipulated to define the box just as he had?
-
How can Skinner put forth any theory as TRUE when, by his definition, he came to these conclusions not based on evidence and observation, but my mechanics.
-
-
Perhaps it was meant for him not to see outside of the box and he had no choice in the manner.
-
Presuming, just for a minute, if Determinism were absolutely true.
Would this statement change anything?
-
We don't know what is determined, so we might as well not be.
Chapter 12 - Manipulation and the New Elite
Page 231
What is Reductionist?
One who would reduce man to an electrochemical machine.
Chapter 12 - Manipulation and the New Elite
Page 234
Anyone noticing Dr. Crick is holding himself out of the Box?
-
It seems each philosopher believes they hold the keys to knowledge and we will all be better off if everyone would just listen and obey.
Chapter 12 - Manipulation and the New Elite
Page 238
3 Brains
-
On what evidence do you think this is based?
-
Do we have more horse's characteristics and less of a dog's?
-
If arbitrary, then what does that say of Science now?
-
A means to discovering HOW and WHY or a means to an end?
-
Without absolutes, even their Science is subject to non-science, or nonsense.
Chapter 12 - Manipulation and the New Elite
Page 242
How come we were outraged by Hitler years before Stalin bothered us?
-
They were doing about the same thing. China too. Killing off their expendables.
-
Stalin headed a Communist country which had same philosophy as the liberal press.
Chapter 12 - Manipulation and the New Elite
Page 243
What is News?
-
Ever heard of "Gravitas"?
-
Everywhere about 3 weeks before 2000 Presidential election, even mentioned 11 times on the 1st day by 11 different journalists, concerning Bush and Chaney.
-
Who spun that word into an issue and made every pundit in the nation comment on its merits as if it mattered?
-
New York Times can produce a misleading article on the front page, and then later run a retraction buried deep in the paper in small print.
-
Anyone can now quote the article from the New York Times as "authoritative", and with NO retraction ever forthcoming since they did have a reliable source.
-
Hence, a lie becomes "TRUE"?
-
Run a poll and then the Poll is news.
-
You think a Poll should be news?
-
Some celebrities are only celebrities because the media treats them as such.
-
Journalist report what was said and then frame the discussions about what was said. What would happen if no one responded to what a particular celebrity or politician said?
-
Prelection:
-
When Bush I ran against Clinton in 1992, we had a recession. We knew this because the media told us so every day.
-
When Bush II ran against Gore in 2000 we had a booming economy. We knew this because the media told us this every day.
-
Post Election:
-
1992 - There was no recession. Oops! Sorry.
-
2000 - Economic slowdown and the books were being 'cooked' (same sort of crime we corporations did, but government gets a pass). Oops! Sorry
-
Haven't we already arrived at manipulation?
Chapter 13 - The Alternatives
Chapter 13 - The Alternatives
Page 246
Economic Break Down
-
The book obviously written in 70's
-
Inflation was big killer until Ronald Reagan in the 80s.
-
Influenced perception.
-
Not to say there still isn't a huge problem with populist.
-
People are for sale.
-
Pure and simple.
-
How long we can produce wealth is US to keep buying support is questionable?
-
Most wealth in US is virtual wealth.
-
Services
-
Credit
-
Few goods manufactured in US anymore
-
$ dollars $ are only as good as our faith
Chapter 13 - The Alternatives
Page 247
Today War seems framed in Islam & Infidels language.
-
Not to say China isn't putting the moves on the world in a very subtle way - imagination.
-
Honduras - Canal
-
Mostly Chinese in a few years.
-
2nd generation will be citizens and majority.
-
East Russia going the same way.
-
US & Southwest going same way with Mexico.
-
If people Integrate into the common culture, fine.
-
If multiculturalism continues, then later one culture will ascend and the other will be repressed.
Chapter 13 - The Alternatives
Page 248
Chaos of violence
Chapter 13 - The Alternatives
Page 248
Radical redistribution of the wealth of the world.
-
Is it American to believe we should be subservient to a World Order?
Chapter 13 - The Alternatives
Page 248
Growing Shortage of food and other Natural Resources in the World
-
Author is gripped with same pessimism he has seen in so many philosophers.
Chapter 13 - The Alternatives
Page 250
What is Pragmatism?
-
Doing what seems to work without regard to right, wrong, or principles.
Active Faith tape
-
Involvement of Religion in politics in our US History
-
Most Christian country in the world
-
Can we separate moral and political views?
-
Religion 1st Political institutions
-
Religion Society
-
Pushed America into Revolution
-
Great Awakening
-
Who?
-
3 hr Sermon
-
10+ years before Revolution
-
Evangelistic preachers supported Revolution as how?
-
Christian --> Slavery was a sin
-
Theodore Walls
-
Abolitionist candidate
-
Christianity into politics
-
Republican Party was born in this revival
-
Temperance Movement
-
Probation Movement
-
Women Christian Temperance Movement
-
Social Gospel Movement
-
Christianity and Democratic Party
-
Immigration
-
Walter Rostenbushe - Preacher
-
Industrial Revolution
-
Created Greed and Exploited working class
-
Christians create a just Social Order
-
Unions
-
Minimum Wage
-
Child Labor Laws
-
Social Insurance
-
Secular world against these Christian Standards
-
Revival and Alter call these Christian Standards to Democratic Party
Comments for the Web guy? (
)